Tuesday, June 20, 2006

The last Samurai

All things parallel

Over the past few days, the movie The Last Samurai has been aired several times on AMC network. The story is about Emperor’s pursuit of modernization of Japan at the end of the 19th century. Employed by the Japanese government is a washed up Civil War hero who is enlisted to go to Japan to train the emperors army in the way of combat that was used in the western world as it was known at that time.

In addition to the that aspect of the movie, the Emperor and his advisors felt that there is no longer a need for Samurai warriors, who for thousands of years were the knights of feudal Japan, keeping order amongst the city states and warring for the now defunct warlords of the regions.

Under the new Japan, it was now against the law for the thousands of Samurai to walk proudly through the streets wearing their traditional swords. What was once a symbol of pride and strength was now looked upon as shame, disgrace and antiquity.

Our washed up captain, on a routine squabble with the samurai is injured in battle and is taken prisoner by the Samurai and is kept there in their camp until he is well enough to return to his post. Over the course of his stay he has endured the trials and tribulations of being their prisoner or guest as you may see fit. The interesting thing is what he went to destroy as a mercenary he later became the advocate for. The film continues with his internal struggle between right and wrong and eventually leads the Samurai into battle against the forces of modernity. As the only survivor, the captain relates to the Emperor that the Samurai fought with honor and died bravely in the quest to preserve their tradition and culture.

Upon hearing how the battle went, and that all the Samurai we wiped out, the Emperor then realized that it was indeed a great blunder to try to eradicate the Samurai in the pursuit of modernity and later realized that the two could coexist in the new Japan. His words were “We have built railroads that unified the lands, we dress in the clothes of the West, we do business with many countries. But if we cannot remember our past and how we got here then there is no future.”

Every time I watch that movie I can’t help but see the parallels of our own people and culture. Could the Samurai be the rebbes of Europe Devoted to tradition of the avos giving over the mesorah that they got from fathers and so on? Are the Emperors and his advisors the modernists who feel that the old ways just don’t work anymore?

Once the last pre Churban Europe rebbe is gone we will loose an important part of our past. Who will pass on the sword to the next generation? What does the government of Israel have in store for the chariedi brothers who are living the ways of the Samurai?

I’m really to scared to know.

6 Comments:

At Tuesday, June 20, 2006, Blogger BasTorah said...

welcome back

 
At Wednesday, June 21, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

this is what happens when u have too much time on your hands;your brains gets constipated and u publish dreck

 
At Wednesday, June 21, 2006, Blogger energynorm said...

It is up to parents, teachers and Rabbis to pass the proverbial sword on to the next generations. And it is up to all the big Rabbis of this generation to ensure that continuity.

 
At Thursday, June 22, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not sure why you are so surprised about the Israeli flag. Don't we daven three times a day with numerous mentions of Tzion, or Eretz Yisroel? The centrality of Eretz Yisroel in Yiddishkeit is incredible. The Ramban goes as far as to say that the mitzvos we perform in golus are just practicing for when we are in E"Y. We discuss what he REALLY meant by that all day, but no one can argue with the idea that is a very extreme statement that says an awful lot about the centrality of E"y. Now, you will say, but the medina is not E'Y. Well, that distinction is only necessary for a chareidi, but the fact is that most non-chareidim don't really care about that distinction. To them the identification of the medina and the land are similar. Chareidim have a point, and maybe non-Chareidim should think about the distinction more (many did after the Gush Katif disengagement recently). But on the flip side, many Chareidim have the opposite problem. Because of their disdain for the medina, they also forget about the importance of the Land.
As for non-religious Jews, there's not to much to say. In most cases, Israel is proportionally far more important to them than Yiddishkeit. ( I am way oversimplifying this, I know, but right now I don't want to go into it).
Ron

 
At Tuesday, August 22, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i dont think its the right thing to kvote from movies ymsm

 
At Friday, October 26, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think about this all the time. I wonder all the time about my obligation to my grandparents--what they suffered through in the war, what their entire family died for. Its heart wrenching.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home